Maternal Heart Rate Variability and Fetal Behavior in Hypertensive and Normotensive Pregnancies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relation between maternal heart rate variability (HRV) and fetal behavior was examined in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women. A total of 40 mother-fetal pairs (n = 20 normotensive mothers; n = 20 hypertensive mothers) at 33-41 weeks' gestation were observed using a standardized procedure lasting approximately 50 min. It included the following measurements: maternal beat-by-beat arterial blood pressure and HRV; spontaneous fetal heart rate (HR), body and breathing movements; and an estimate of amniotic fluid volume. The women in the hypertensive group had higher average body mass index (BMI) (33.7 vs. 28.8 kg/m2) than the normotensive group. In the normotensive group, there was no association between maternal HRV and fetal gestational age, HR, body or breathing movements. In the hypertensive group, maternal HRV measures of low-frequency, high-frequency, and total power were associated with fetal gestational age; also, there was an association between maternal autonomic modulation of HR and fetal spontaneous HR. These findings suggest that the maternal autonomic system influences fetal cardiac function in pregnancies complicated by hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".