Hand posture recognition using K-NN and Support Vector Machine classifiers evaluated on our proposed HandReader dataset
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a real-time vision-based hand posture recognition approach, based on appearance-based features of the hand poses. Our approach has three main steps: Preprocessing, Feature Extraction and Posture Recognition. Additionally, a new hand posture dataset called HandReader is created and introduced. HandReader is a dataset of 500 images of 10 different hand postures which are 10 non-motion-based American Sign Language alphabets with dark backgrounds. The dataset is gathered by capturing images of 50 male and female individuals performing these 10 hand postures in front of a common camera. 20% of the HandReader images are used for the training purpose and the remaining 80% are used to test the proposed methodology. All the images are normalized after applying the preprocessing step. The normalized images are then converted to feature vectors in the Feature Extraction step. In order to train the system, k-NN classifier and SVM classifiers with linear and RBF kernel have been employed and results were compared. These approaches were used to classify hand posture images into 10 different posture classes. The SVM classifier with linear kernel performed better with the highest true detection rate (96%) among other proposed techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it