MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153435936 · doi:10.1029/2005jd006369

Optical Spectrograph and Infra‐Red Imaging System (OSIRIS) observations of mesospheric OH A<sup>2</sup>Σ<sup>+</sup>‐X<sup>2</sup>Π 0‐0 and 1‐1 band resonance emissions

2006· article· en· W2153435936 on OpenAlexafffund
R. L. Gattinger, D. A. Degenstein, E. J. Llewellyn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Space AgencyLangley Research CenterTekesU.S. Naval Research LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsOsirisSpectrographMesosphereRayleigh scatteringResonance fluorescenceAtmosphere (unit)Resonance (particle physics)PhysicsStratosphereAtomic physicsFluorescenceSpectral lineAtmospheric sciencesOpticsMeteorologyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although only a minor species, the OH molecule plays an important role in the photochemical control of mesospheric ozone density and has been the target of a number of observational programs, principally through the OH A2Σ+‐X2Π 0‐0 band emission at 308 nm. This emission band arises from solar resonance fluorescence excitation of OH X2Π ground state molecules, and its observation is complicated by the presence of an underlying atmospheric Rayleigh scattering spectrum. We show that the OH A2Σ+‐X2Π 0‐0 band emission has been reliably and routinely detected with the moderately low, 0.9 nm, spectral resolution Optical Spectrograph and Infra‐Red Imaging System (OSIRIS) limb scanning spectrograph. Changes in upper mesospheric water vapor observed by the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) are readily detected as changes in the OH density profiles seen by OSIRIS. Altitude profiles of OH density in the middle and upper mesosphere are in good agreement with model results that incorporate coordinated HALOE water vapor measurements. The agreement is within the HALOE and OSIRIS error limits when the recommended standard reaction rates are assumed. Conversely, model calculations of OH density using the revised reaction rates proposed to explain the Middle Atmosphere High‐Resolution Spectrograph Investigation (MAHRSI) OH profiles typically fall outside the observed OSIRIS error limits. The OSIRIS results suggest that the probable difference between the observed and modeled OH densities is less than 15% from 55 to 80 km. Diurnal and seasonal OH variations observed by OSIRIS are in good agreement with model predictions. These successful comparisons suggest that the OSIRIS OH database, spanning more than 4 years of operation and broad ranges of latitude and local time, can contribute significantly to studies of OH photochemistry and upper mesospheric water vapor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207