MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153450807 · doi:10.1109/dcc.2003.1194074

Soft-decoding based vector quantization for hidden-Markov channels

2003· article· en· W2153450807 on OpenAlexaff
Pradeepa Yahampath, M. Pawlak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingDecoding methodsRayleigh fadingAlgorithmComputer scienceVector quantizationHidden Markov modelMarkov processChannel (broadcasting)Markov modelMinimum mean square errorChannel state informationMarkov chainSpeech recognitionWirelessMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. Channel optimized vector quantization (COVQ) has received considerable attention as an approach to joint source-channel coding. COVQ for hidden Markov channels was studied, with application in wireless communication over fading channels. The optimal VQ decoding was considered for finite state channels when the channel state is not explicitly observed at the receiver. A hidden Markov model (HMM) with a continuous observation space is constructed for the channel by assuming both channel input and channel state are first-order Markov process. A recursive-decoding algorithm is derived for computing the minimum mean square error (MMSE) optimal estimate for the source vector, based on the observed channel output sequence. In simulation experiments, the performance of a communications system based on the proposed quantizer is investigated for a Gauss-Markov signal source and a frequency non-selective Rayleigh fading channel. The results indicate that for fading channels, proposed soft-decoding based COVQ can results in a substantial improvement of performance over detection based COVQ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207