The seminary experience: Conceptual worlds of first-career and second-career seminarians
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Intended Curriculum: What Seminaries Hope To Do Porter (2006) distinguishes between various meanings of a school's curriculum.The intended curriculum refers to explicit statements about what ought to be taught.Course descriptions in a school's catalog describe the intended curriculum.The enacted curriculum refers to the various kinds of instruction actually delivered by a school.The learned curriculum, finally, is what students actually learn.This section discusses the intended curriculum in North American theological seminaries, focusing on the past 40 years.experiences require them to engage "multiple systems as employees or parents" (p.583) may acquire skills in self-advocacy and achieve satisfying experiences in field work. First-and Second-Career Students in Nursing SchoolsNursing is another helping profession often compared to ministry because of its service orientation (Barretti, 2004;Wheeler, Miller, & Aleshire, 2007).This section introduces published literature about nursing students, then reviews studies that take into account age as a variable of interest.The section ends with a critique of extant research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it