MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153527763 · doi:10.3138/md.49.3.235

<i>Ja, til Island!</i> The Icelandic Reception of <i>Hærmændene paa Helgeland</i>

2006· article· en· W2153527763 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Merrill Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcelandicDramaHistoryArtLiteraturePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The final lines of Hærmændene paa Helgeland point to Iceland, whither the survivors of Ibsen’s 1858 Viking drama fare on longships. ‘‘Aye’’ says Ørnulf to Gunnar, ‘‘to Iceland.’’ What befalls them there, we are not told. However, the play does have an Icelandic fifth act, after a fashion. More than thirty years later, the play lands in Reykjavı´k as Vı´kingarnir a´ Ha´logalandi, an Icelandic translation by Indriði Einarsson. The performance of this work in 1892, also directed by Indriði,1 was the first production of any Ibsen play in Iceland and one of the very first performances of drama on the Icelandic stage (it occasioned the printing of Iceland’s first playbill). This was a historic moment, and the Icelandic press gave it attention as such.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207