MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2153552213 · doi:10.1109/aps.1991.174974

Characteristics of biconical microstrip antennas

2002· article· en· W2153552213 on OpenAlexaff
Yu‐Chen Lin, L. Shafai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostripConical surfaceMicrostrip antennaPhysicsBandwidth (computing)Transverse planeOpticsElectrical impedanceEigenvalues and eigenvectorsAntenna (radio)MathematicsGeometryComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characteristics of biconical microstrip antennas asymmetrically excited by a coaxial probe feed are studied. The antenna consists of a conducting cone cap on a grounded cone separated by an electrically thin dielectric. A study of the theta -dependent eigenvalues nu of the spherical wave functions in the omega direction has shown that there is a unique nontrivial eigenvalue for each TE (transverse electric) mode, and for the TM (transverse magnetic) modes all eigenvalues are trivial solutions. Their input impedance, bandwidth, and radiation patterns for different grounded cone angles are presented. The analysis of the conical microstrip antenna, the special case of these antennas, where the grounded core becomes a plane, predicts that their bandwidth is wider than that of similar-size planar circular disc antennas.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and Analysis→French-language works237,207→