Geological significance of high-resolution magnetic data in the Quesnel terrane, Central British Columbia<sup>1</sup>This article is one of a series of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme of <i>New insights in Cordilleran Intermontane geoscience: reducing exploration risk in the mountain pine beetle-affected area, British Columbia</i>.<sup>2</sup>Geological Survey of Canada Contribution No. 20100225.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability of airborne sensors to image the magnetic signatures of prospective Quesnel terrane rocks through ubiquitous Quaternary glacial sedimentary cover in central British Columbia helps target new areas for mineral exploration. Newly acquired high-resolution data provide new perspectives on the nature and probable areal distribution of many geological units, revealing detail and information unattainable by conventional geological mapping. In combination with gravity data, these magnetic data indicate the presence of a granitic intrusion and a development of Nicola Group volcanic rocks, both potential hosts for porphyry- and (or) vein-type mineralization, under younger Tertiary volcanic cover. At a finer scale, magnetic patterns and fabrics permit discrimination between volcanic rocks of the Tertiary Chilcotin and Kamloops groups, and detection of subtle compositional and (or) structural variations within the groups. Contacts between volcanic cover and basement rocks and between basement units are more accurately defined, significantly reducing locally the areal extent of volcanic cover and opening up more ground for exploration. The high resolution of features in images of magnetic vertical derivatives reveals the Naver pluton to be more complex than currently mapped, comprising several integral elements, one of which may be a large roof pendant. Internal subdivisions of the Thuya batholith are defined, and annular marginal phases are proposed within two large granodioritic intrusions. Several new intrusions are proposed within the extensive, mainly sedimentary Devonian–Triassic terrain northeast of Kamloops, internal composition variation is suggested for some larger mapped intrusions, and areas underlain by some intrusions are enlarged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".