Hydrodynamics of turbulent bed contactor with non‐Newtonian liquids: Net pressure drop and minimum fluidisation velocity (part 2)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study investigates the hydrodynamic behaviour of non‐Newtonian liquids under different operating conditions in a turbulent bed contactor (TBC). Hollow plastic spheres were fluidised in an air stream flowing counter currently to an aqueous solution of carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) of an apparent viscosity ranging from 5 to 25 mPa s. A set of experiments was carried out to investigate the net pressure drop and minimum fluidisation velocity of the process. The column was operated at different superficial gas velocities, liquid flow rates, CMC solution concentrations and static bed heights. Results show that the net pressure drop is independent of the superficial gas velocity, but it increases steadily with liquid flow rate and static bed height. However, it remains almost invariant with a relatively low CMC concentration (0.2–0.4 wt%), and it augments gradually as the CMC percent exceeds the threshold of 0.4 wt% which corresponds to a more viscous liquid solution. The minimum fluidisation velocity decreases with a CMC concentration lower than 0.5 wt% approximately, but increases as the CMC percent exceeds 0.5 wt%. The study presents a new insight on the behaviour of non‐Newtonian solutions in TBC columns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".