Tap withdrawal circuit interneurons require CREB for long-term habituation in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the role of the Caenorhabditis elegans CREB (cAMP response element binding protein) homologue, crh-1, in response to tap (nonlocalized mechanosensory stimulation) and tap habituation. Worms with a loss-of-function mutation in crh-1 performed smaller reversals in response to tap than did wild-type worms and did not show long-term memory for spaced training 24-hr posttraining; however, they did show short-term habituation to tap stimuli when stimuli were presented at both 10-s and 60-s interstimulus intervals, and showed 12-hr intermediate memory for spaced habituation training (intermediate-term memory). Expressing CRH-1 broadly throughout the nervous system and in a subset of interneurons of the tap withdrawal circuit, but not in the mechanosensory neurons, rescued the long-term memory defects observed in crh-1 mutants. Here we show for the first time that CREB is required for long-term habituation and show that the interneurons of the tap withdrawal response circuit are the locus of plasticity for long-term mechanosensory habituation in C. elegans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".