MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153623534 · doi:10.7202/1016349ar

Deux mères, un donneur et des enfants. Motivations des actrices et acteurs quant à l’établissement de la famille lesboparentale avec donneur connu

2013· article· fr· W2153623534 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Isabel Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’une des pratiques familiales émergentes méconnue est la famille homoparentale. Bien qu’elle soit l’objet de recherche depuis plusieurs années, il reste un important travail de production de savoirs sur cette dynamique familiale. Cet article présente une partie des résultats d’une recherche portant sur un type spécifique de famille homoparentale, soit la famille lesboparentale dont les enfants sont nés d’un donneur de sperme connu. Plus précisément, dans cet article, nous analyserons les motivations des mères à avoir leurs enfants avec un donneur connu et les raisons qui ont amené les donneurs à collaborer à l’établissement du projet parental du couple lesbien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207