Influence of ‘bouchot’ mussel culture on the benthic environment in a dynamic intertidal system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study examines the influence of mussel aquaculture structures (bouchots) in the intertidal zone of the Chausey Archipelago (Normandy, France) where strong tidal currents are predicted to disperse biodeposits. Six sites were sampled to determine the spatial variability of organic matter content, sediment grain size, and benthic infaunal community characteristics. The influence of bouchots on the benthic environment was evident at both the mesoscale (i.e. km-scale, between farm and reference sites) and small-scale (i.e. m-scale, spatial structure within farms but not reference sites). This influence was also apparent for sediment grain size distribution and most metrics of macrobenthic community structure, but not for sediment organic matter. Mussel culture structures likely modify natural flow patterns within farm sites, which increases shear stress around individual bouchots, thereby increasing the heterogeneity of benthic communities, altering the dominance of particular species within farms and differentiating them from reference sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it