MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153665374 · doi:10.1002/maco.200503900

Hot erosion wear and carburization in petrochemical furnaces

2006· article· en· W2153665374 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R.L. Deuis, A.M. Brown, S. A. Petrone

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials and Corrosion · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceMetallurgyCoatingMicrostructureAlloyErosionPetrochemicalCorrosionComposite materialWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High temperature alloy stainless steels used in olefins manufacturing furnaces are exposed to extreme environmental degradation processes inclusive of carburization, oxidation and hot erosion wear. A study was undertaken to understand the hot erosion wear phenomenon in relation to substrate composition, atmosphere, temperature, time and the influence of carburization. An erosion wear test rig was designed and constructed to simulate the wear degradation process up to 1200°C. Results have shown a surprising relationship between erosion wear rate and temperature for the most prominent stainless steel alloy used in the industry. A novel coating technology was developed for mitigation that enables the non‐line‐of‐sight application of protective macro‐coatings typically 1 to 5 mm in thickness. Stainless steel coupons treated with these macro‐coatings have exhibited an enhanced resistance to both oxidation and carburization. These macro‐coatings also provide superior hot erosion wear resistance as compared to the uncoated stainless steel. A thorough examination of the microstructure and micro‐mechanical properties of the coatings is presented. Targeted applications include petrochemical furnace fittings (return bends), thermo‐wells and transfer‐line‐exchanger (TLE) surfaces. Commercial furnace trials of the prototype products have been initiated with some prototypes in field trials for over 18 months. Results of both laboratory accelerated testing and field evaluation will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials and CorrosionSame topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207