Bibliographic record
Abstract
La prise en compte du langage corporel, du non verbal et des réactions contre-transférentielles dans l’intervention et plus particulièrement en psychothérapie est une démarche reconnue quoique d’importance inégale selon les approches ou points de vue. En ce qui concerne l’abord des jeunes de la rue ou en grande difficulté, la lecture et l’écoute du langage du corps deviennent essentielles voire incontournables. En effet, celui-ci participe à l’articulation des formes de détresse et d’affirmation de ces jeunes, lesquelles peuvent susciter des réactions très intenses chez l’intervenant qui a comme projet d’aller à leur rencontre. Le travail en équipe et l’écoute de son propre corps deviennent pour l’intervenant des impératifs tout aussi incontournables afin de préserver sa propre vitalité et son intégrité psychique. Interroger le corps, le sien et celui de l’autre est donc au coeur de la clinique de la précarité et de l’addiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".