MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153704724 · doi:10.1093/infdis/jir415

Critical Role for Streptococcussuis Cell Wall Modifications and Suilysin in Resistance to Complement-Dependent Killing by Dendritic Cells

2011· article· en· W2153704724 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie-Pier Lecours, Marcelo Gottschalk, Mathieu Houde, Paul Lemire, Nahuel Fittipaldi, Mariela Segura

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrobiologyPeptidoglycanImmune systemStreptococcus suisVirulenceBiologyPhagocytosisLipoteichoic acidLytic cycleVirulence factorPathogenCell biologyDendritic cellCell wallImmunologyBacteriaStaphylococcus aureusGeneVirusGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Streptococcus suis is an emerging zoonotic agent of septicemia and meningitis. Knowledge on host immune responses toward S. suis and strategies used by this pathogen for subversion of these responses is scarce. Here, S. suis modulation of dendritic cell (DC) functions were assessed for the first time. Using S. suis knockout mutants in capsular polysaccharide (CPS) expression, it was shown that CPS blocks DC phagocytosis and impairs cytokine release by hindering cell wall components. Mutants impaired in D-alanylation of lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or N-deacetylation of peptidoglycan (PG) further demonstrated the importance of cell wall in modulation of DC activation. Notably, LTA/PG modifications were identified as major players in resistance to complement-dependent killing by DCs. Finally, S. suis hemolysin was partially involved in cytokine release and also contributed to bacterial escape of opsonophagocytosis. Overall, S. suis uses its arsenal of virulence factors to modulate DC functions and escape immune surveillance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207