MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2153706516 · doi:10.1109/sips.2011.6088999

Compressed sensing based MR image reconstruction from multiple partial K-space scans

2011· article· en· W2153706516 on OpenAlexafffund
Angshul Majumdar, Rabab Ward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCompressed sensingk-spaceIterative reconstructionComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSIGNAL (programming language)Signal reconstructionSignal averagingSampling (signal processing)Noise (video)Real-time MRISignal processingAlgorithmMagnetic resonance imagingImage (mathematics)MathematicsFourier transformSignal transfer function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), signal averaging is an established technique for reducing white Gaussian noise or motion artifacts. Acquiring multiple scans for signal averaging is time consuming. To reduce the data acquisition time, Compressed Sensing (CS) based techniques advocate partial scanning of the K-space only. Instead of using averaging techniques in conjunction with CS based reconstruction, this work proposes a novel formulation that produces extremely accurate reconstruction results. Our method gives the same reconstruction accuracy at 50% K-space sampling as does the conventional signal averaging of the full K-space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→