Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir du paradoxe selon lequel l’artisanat, « première entreprise de France », constitue un objet d’observation important tout en étant relativement mal connu et peu exploré, cet article propose de décrire la nature de chacune des entreprises qui composent cet ensemble institutionnel. Le but affiché est alors de contribuer à une meilleure intelligibilité de la TPE artisanale en tant que forme d’organisation spécifique, notamment en termes de fonctionnement et de pilotage. En prenant appui sur la transposition au cas de la TPE artisanale, de l’approche identitaire, initialement destinée aux grandes organisations, une représentation conceptuelle du système identitaire de l’entreprise artisanale est proposée sous la forme d’un système identitaire particulier. Cette représentation est ensuite validée par une étude empirique réalisée auprès d’un échantillon de 346 artisans. Les résultats conduisent notamment à mettre en relief deux configurations identitaires concurrentes : celle de l’artisan et celle de l’entrepreneur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".