MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153734993

Spatio-temporal object recognition using variational learning of an infinite statistical model

2013· article· en· W2153734993 on OpenAlexaff
Wentao Fan, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Signal Processing Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInferenceArtificial intelligenceBayesian inferenceMachine learningStatistical modelBayes' theoremObject (grammar)Statistical inferencePattern recognition (psychology)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionFeature (linguistics)Activity recognitionNonparametric statisticsBayesian probabilityKey (lock)Mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present a sophisticated variational Bayes framework for learning infinite Beta-Liouville mixture models. A key feature of the proposed framework is that the appropriate mixture model complexity can be discovered automatically from the data to cluster as part of the inference procedure. Another important advantage is that the whole inference process itself is analytically tractable with closed-form solutions. Moreover, the problems of over-fitting and under-fitting are also prevented thanks to the nonparametric Bayesian nature of the proposed framework. The effectiveness of our statistical framework is investigated on two challenging motion recognition tasks including hand gesture and human activity recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Signal Processing ConferenceSame topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207