Contraintes nationales et changement d’échelle dans l’activisme transnational
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore chacun des trois éléments principaux du programme de recherche classique pour l’étude des mouvements sociaux (opportunités politiques, structures de mobilisation et processus de cadrage) afin d’évaluer leur rôle dans l’activisme transnational. L’idée d’émergence d’une société civile globale est sous-jacente dans plusieurs analyses du mouvement pour une justice globale. Un certain nombre d’auteurs prétendent que le nouveau cycle de protestation (transnational) témoigne de l’émergence d’un mouvement de mouvements ainsi que d’une société civile mondiale et reflète le déclin des formes de protestation qui s’adressent au plan national. Ce type d’argument ne gagne pas notre faveur ; selon nous, il néglige l’impact crucial de certains facteurs locaux et surestime l’idée de l’émergence de la société civile transnationale. Nous défendons plutôt l’idée que chacun des cycles de manifestations repose sur des structures de mobilisation et des épisodes do contestation préalables
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".