MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153772096 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2014-0260

Time-resolved electrospray mass spectrometry — a brief history

2014· article· en· W2153772096 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Cristina Lento, Gerald F. Audette, Derek J. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillisecondChemistryMass spectrometryHydrogen–deuterium exchangeElectrospray ionizationFolding (DSP implementation)Flow chemistryMicrofluidicsInstrumentation (computer programming)Substrate (aquarium)NanotechnologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review describes the evolution of time-resolved electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (TRESI-MS), a technology that was developed in large part at Western University. TRESI-MS was initially designed to characterize rapid chemical and biochemical reactions occurring on the millisecond time scale without need for a chromophore. Early TRESI-MS setups usually consisted of continuous-flow rapid mixers with a fixed tee for analysis of a single time point, and later adjustable reaction chamber devices allowing for automatic tracking of the reaction over time. Advances in instrumentation design over the years have resulted in improved time resolution, with microfluidic device implementation allowing for coupling to hydrogen−deuterium exchange (HDX) experiments. Areas of application that will be discussed include the investigation of protein folding intermediates, identification of enzyme−substrate intermediates in the pre-steady state, and the use of time-resolved HDX to study the dynamics of weakly structured protein regions. While some limitations still persist with the method, the continued development of TRESI-MS and related approaches paves the way to a promising future and the study of unexplored application areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207