MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153775317 · doi:10.3109/00207450109149747

Synchronized Feeding as a “Conditioned Stimulus” for Overt Seizures in Chronically (Limbic) Epileptic Rats: A Model for “Psychogenic Seizures” with Complex Partial Epilepsy

2001· article· en· W2153775317 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Persinger, G. Chellew-bellanger

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Neuroscience · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyPilocarpinePsychologyStimulus (psychology)Limbic systemPsychogenic diseaseNeuroscienceSeizure thresholdAmygdalaAnesthesiaAnticonvulsantMedicineDevelopmental psychologyCentral nervous systemPsychiatryPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic limbic epilepsy was induced in male albino rats by a single systemic injection of lithium (3 mEq/kg) and pilocarpine (30 mg/kg). During the subsequent months the numbers of spontaneous, paroxysmal stereotyped episodes (analogous to Racine stages 4 and 5) were monitored. The numbers of these "overt seizures" increased within 10 min of the daily presentation of a food stimulus even though food was available ad libitum. The majority of the paroxysmal, stereotyped behaviours occurred within 1 min of the stimulus presentation; they were attenuated by oral prednisolone. Three rats displayed evidence of "conditioned seizures" to specific stimuli. The results suggest that the display of these behaviours can be synchronized and learned in contexts that are associated with the release of CRF (corticotrophin releasing factor) and may involve the disinhibited activity within the central amygdaloid nucleus of these rats. Implications for the occurrence of psychogenic seizures in patients with complex partial (limbic) epilepsy are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of NeuroscienceSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207