No Circadian Rhythms in Testis: Period1 Expression Is Clock Independent and Developmentally Regulated in the Mouse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spermatogenesis is a process whereby haploid spermatozoa differentiate through meiosis from precursor stem cells. We examined the expression of circadian clock genes in the testis, to assess clock control over the timing of different developmental events. Clock genes are known to oscillate with circadian rhythmicity in the central clock structure, the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, but also in peripheral tissues. Here we show that Per1 gene expression in the testis is constant over a 24-h period and that the Per1 transcript is expressed at a level higher than the peak values of the Per1 oscillations observed for other tissues. Bmal1, another clock gene whose expression oscillates in other tissues, also shows constant expression levels in the testis. In addition, the levels and phosphorylation state of the PER1 protein are not oscillating at all times of day. Strikingly, Per1 is restricted primarily to step 7 to 10 spermatids and thus appears to be developmentally regulated. The expression of the Clock transcript is also developmentally regulated, but it is found principally in spermatogonia and spermatocytes up until the time of the first meiotic division. Per1 expression is not altered in testes from Clock mutant mice, suggesting that CLOCK does not activate Per1 in male germ cells, in contrast to what it does in other mouse tissues. Taken together, our observations suggest that the testis, in contrast to all other peripheral tissues, lacks a functioning circadian clock.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".