On the Robustness of the Predistortion Function Synthesis for Highly Nonlinear RF Power Amplifiers Linearization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the robustness of the digital predistortion function synthesis process applied to linearize a highly non linear RF power amplifier. For this purpose, a 100-watts peak power amplifier designed for UMTS applications biased in deep class AB is used. Two approaches have been compared: the polynomial curve fitting of the measured AM/AM and AM/PM characteristics and the look-up tables synthesis using the smoothed versions of these same non linear curves. The polynomial based fitting presents badly conditioned matrices that make this approach unpractical for the considered non linearity shape particularly for DSP implementation of the synthesis procedure. The accuracy of both approaches was assessed by measuring the adjacent channel power ratio at the output of the power amplifier under a 2-carriers W-CDMA signal. The look-up tables approach based on the averaging technique showed better correction capabilities than the polynomial based fitting
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it