MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153821353 · doi:10.1109/icc.1998.685203

Implementation and performance evaluation of ISAC: integrated services Internet with RSVP over ATM shortcuts

2002· article· en· W2153821353 on OpenAlexafffund
Hungkei Chow, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSignaling protocolSoftware portabilityIntegrated servicesComputer networkAsynchronous Transfer ModeThe InternetMulticastDistributed computingQuality of serviceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an approach to support integrated services Internet with RSVP over ATM shortcuts (ISAC). While similar to other LP switching approaches, our work is different in three major aspects. First, it focuses on supporting the integrated services model whereas other approaches currently support only best effort traffic. Second, our architecture adopts RSVP as the major signaling protocol and eliminates duplication of functionality in the ATM domain. Finally, while heterogeneous multicast has not yet been supported in any other approaches, it is considered in our proposal. Our design strives to achieve three fundamental objectives: (1) ensuring compatibility with existing networking standards, applications and system software, (2) maintaining data path efficiency, and (3) assuring portability for different operating system and switch control protocol. Our proposed architecture has been proven by a prototype implementation. Its operation has been verified by demonstrating a videoconferencing application. Our prototype has also been evaluated by measuring its signaling and control latency as well as the transfer delay of the data path.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207