MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153828182 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2004.1429437

On active acceleration control of vibration isolation systems

2004· article· en· W2153828182 on OpenAlexaff
Wen-Hong Zhu, Bjarni V. Tryggvason

Bibliographic record

Venue2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibration isolationAccelerationControl theory (sociology)Feed forwardIsolation (microbiology)PID controllerVibrationAttenuationCompensation (psychology)Vibration controlController (irrigation)Filter (signal processing)PhysicsAcousticsEngineeringComputer scienceOpticsControl engineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringTemperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibration isolation systems (VIS) have appeared in applications ranging from space shuttle applications to ground vehicle suspensions. In this paper, the significant advantage of using I (integral) and II (double integral) type flotor acceleration feedback control together with feedforward compensation of the umbilical dynamics is analyzed theoretically and is also demonstrated experimentally with respect to a typical system, namely a microgravity isolation mount (MIM) operated in the ground environment. The lowest isolation frequency is reduced by about 40 times with a sufficiently improved vibration isolation performance up to 10 Hz, compared to a conventional PID controller. A unique frequency selective filter (FSF) is proposed to suppress the peak frequency responses caused by umbilical resonant modes. The effectiveness of the FSF is demonstrated experimentally with a 20 dB attenuation at 22.2 Hz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601)Same topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207