MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153846939 · doi:10.1109/tnn.2006.883002

The Impact of Arithmetic Representation on Implementing MLP-BP on FPGAs: A Study

2007· article· en· W2153846939 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArithmeticField-programmable gate arrayRepresentation (politics)Parallel computingTheoretical computer scienceComputer architectureMathematicsComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, arithmetic representations for implementing multilayer perceptrons trained using the error backpropagation algorithm (MLP-BP) neural networks on field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) are examined in detail. Both floating-point (FLP) and fixed-point (FXP) formats are studied and the effect of precision of representation and FPGA area requirements are considered. A generic very high-speed integrated circuit hardware description language (VHDL) program was developed to help experiment with a large number of formats and designs. The results show that an MLP-BP network uses less clock cycles and consumes less real estate when compiled in an FXP format, compared with a larger and slower functioning compilation in an FLP format with similar data representation width, in bits, or a similar precision and range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it