Iris Colour of American Kestrels Varies with Age, Sex, and Exposure to PCBs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For most species of birds, little is known about the pattern and significance of intraspecific variation in iris colour. In early winter, captive American kestrels could be subjectively placed into at least two age categories: 0.5-yr-old birds had all-brown irides, whereas those of older birds were red-brown. As part of a toxicological study on kestrels, we quantified iris colour objectively using a digital camera to examine potential variation due to age, sex, and exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Red, green, and blue values, plus an overall measure of colour using principal components analysis (PC1), were derived for breeding and nonbreeding kestrels 1.5-6.5 yr old (fed PCBs), plus offspring 0.5 yr old (exposed to PCBs only in ovo). Age category (0.5, 1.5, and 2.5+ yr) and PCB exposure consistently had an effect on colour, while sex was significant only for red and almost so for PC1. ANOVA with age as a covariate revealed that the amount of red continued to increase throughout life, but PCBs suppressed the development of that colour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".