MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153881587

A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Screening Tools for Drivers Aged 80 and Over

2014· article· en· W2153881587 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ward Vanlaar, Anna McKiernan, Heather McAteer, Robyn Robertson, Dan Mayhew, David B. Carr, Steve Brown, Erin R. Holmes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleCognitionTest (biology)PsychologyTask (project management)Memory spanDigit symbol substitution testCognitive testApplied psychologyDevelopmental psychologyWorking memoryMedicineEngineeringPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report includes a literature review of the effects of aging on driving and cognitive screening tools to assess older drivers. Screening tools selected for meta-analysis included Maze Task, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test, Letter Cancellation Tests, Traffic Sign Recognition, Charron Test, and Wechsler Digit Symbol Substitution Test. The objective of this analysis was to aid in the selection of cognitive screening tools for use in Ontario, Canada, during group education sessions for drivers aged 80 and over.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOlder Adults Driving StudiesFrench-language works237,207