Using Higuchi’s fractal dimension in fine analysis of the effects of 2.7 mT and 10 mT static magnetic fields on the complex bursting activity of the snail BR neuron
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The components of complex bioelectrical activity ? action potential (AP), interspike interval (ISI) and the quiet interburst interval (IBI), along with the effects of 2.7 mT and 10 mT static magnetic fields, were identified and examined in the spontaneously active Br neuron of the subesophageal ganglion complex of the garden snail Helix pomatia by fractal analysis using Higuchi?s fractal dimension (FD). The normalized mean of the empirical FD distributions of bursting activity of the Br neuron were formed under different experimental conditions: before (Control), during (MF), and after exposure to the static magnetic field (AMF). Using the fractal analysis method for the first time, a separation of the AP, ISI and IBI components was successfully achieved. Our results show that fractal analysis with deconvolution of the normalized mean of the empirical FD distributions into Gaussian functions is a useful tool for revealing the effects of magnetic fields on the complexity of neuronal bioelectric activity and its AP, ISI and IBI components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it