Effet de l’association de certains fongicides avec le chlorure de calcium sur le développement d’un complexe fongique responsable de la pourriture des pommes en conservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’utilisation du bénomyl et du thiabendazole (famille chimique des benzimidazoles), de l’azoxystrobine et du pyriméthanil montre, autant in vitro qu’in vivo, que ces fongicides sont faiblement à moyennement efficaces contre les agents pathogènes suivants : Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium expansum, Aspergillus niger, A. fumigatus, Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Monilia fructigina, Cryptosporiopsis malicorticis, Spilocaea pomi et Trichothecium roseum. Utilisé in vitro, le chlorure de calcium seul à plus de 4 % est toléré par les douze espèces fongiques. In vivo et à basse température, le chlorure de calcium est efficace lorsqu’utilisé à 4 et 6 %. L’association de ces fongicides avec le chlorure de calcium (4 %) permet de diminuer l’intensité des lésions causées par la pourriture des pommes en conservation. Le chlorure de calcium apparaît intervenir en renforçant les liens avec les principaux sites d’action des fongicides de l’agent pathogène évalué.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".