MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153896433 · doi:10.1109/icmlc.2004.1380748

A neurodynamics based neuron-PID controller and its application to inverted pendulum

2005· article· en· W2153896433 on OpenAlexaff
Huidi Zhang, Shirong Liu, Simon X. Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)PID controllerRobustness (evolution)Nonlinear systemInverted pendulumComputer scienceBounded functionController (irrigation)Open-loop controllerSettling timeControl engineeringEngineeringMathematicsClosed loopControl (management)Artificial intelligenceStep responseTemperature controlPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel neuron-PID controller that has some excellent characteristics of nonlinear filtering and auto gain-regulation is developed for nonlinear systems in this paper. The biological neuron described by the shunting model is used to construct a nonlinear controller, which is based on the frame of a typical PID controller. The neural activity of the biological neuron model is stable, bounded and smooth so that the output of the neuron-PID controller is bounded and smooth. The proposed controller can be employed to design a class of flexible and safe control systems. The effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed control strategy have been demonstrated by applying it to the stabilization control of an inverted pendulum with uncertain dynamics. The simulations show that the dynamic responses of the control system can be effectively improved and the robustness of the proposed controller is better than that of the PID controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207