CHAOTIFICATION OF DISCRETE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS IN BANACH SPACES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is concerned with chaotification of discrete dynamical systems in Banach spaces via feedback control techniques. A criterion of chaos in Banach spaces is first established. This criterion extends and improves the Marotto theorem. Discussions are carried out in general and some special Banach spaces. All the controlled systems are proved to be chaotic in the sense of both Devaney and Li–Yorke. As a consequence, a controlled system described in a finite-dimensional real space studied by Wang and Chen is shown chaotic not only in the sense of Li–Yorke but also in the sense of Devaney. The original system can be driven to be chaotic by using an arbitrarily small-amplitude state feedback control in a certain space. In addition, the Chen–Lai anti-control algorithm via feedback control with mod-operation in a finite-dimensional real space is extended to a certain infinite-dimensional Banach space, and the controlled system is shown chaotic in the sense of Devaney as well as in the sense of both Li–Yorke and Wiggins. Differing from many existing results, it is not here required that the map corresponding to the original system has a fixed point in some cases. An application of the theoretical results to a class of first-order partial difference equations is given with some numerical simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it