3D Pose tracking of walker users' lower limb with a structured-light camera on a moving platform
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tracking and understanding human gait is an important step towards improving elderly mobility and safety. Our research team is developing a vision-based tracking system that estimates the 3D pose of a wheeled walker user's lower limbs with a depth sensor, Kinect, mounted on the moving walker. Our tracker estimates 3D poses from depth images of the lower limbs in the coronal plane in a dynamic, uncontrolled environment. We employ a probabilistic approach based on particle filtering, with a measurement model that works directly in the 3D space and another measurement model that works in the projected image space. Empirical results show that combining both measurements, assuming independence between them, yields tracking results that are better than with either one alone. Experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of the tracking system with different users. We demonstrate that the tracker is robust against unfavorable conditions such as partial occlusion, missing observations, and deformable tracking target. Also, our tracker does not require user intervention or manual initialization commonly required in most trackers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it