MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153939252 · doi:10.1243/09544062jmes1777

Vibration-based fault diagnosis of slurry pump impellers using neighbourhood rough set models

2009· article· en· W2153939252 on OpenAlexaff
Xujun Zhao, Qiang Hu, Yaguo Lei, Ming J. Zuo

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)ImpellerRough setPattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsData miningEngineeringMathematical analysisMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rough set models have been widely used as a method for feature selection in fault diagnosis. A neighbourhood rough set model can deal with both nominal and numerical features, but selecting the neighbourhood size for its application may be a challenge. In this article, the authors illustrate that using a common neighbourhood size for all features may overestimate or underestimate a feature's dependency degree. The neighbourhood rough set model is then modified by setting different neighbourhood sizes for different features. The modified model is applied to the fault diagnosis of slurry pump impellers. Results show that the chosen feature subsets generated by the modified neighbourhood rough set model can be physically explained by the corresponding flow patterns and can achieve higher classification accuracy than the raw feature subsets and the feature subsets generated by the original neighbourhood rough set model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicRough Sets and Fuzzy LogicFrench-language works237,207