Signaling over MIMO Multi-Base Systems: Combination of Multi-Access and Broadcast Schemes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new structure for multi-base systems is studied in which each user receives data from two nearby base stations, rather than only from the strongest one. This system can be considered as a combination of broadcast and multi-access channels. By taking advantages of both perspectives, an achievable rate region for a discrete memoryless channel modeled by Pr(y1,y2|x1,x2) is derived. In this model, x1and x2represent the transmitted signals by the transmitter one and two, respectively, and y1and y2denote the received signals by the receiver one and two, respectively. In this derivation, it is assumed that each transmitter is unaware of the data of the other transmitter, and therefore x1and x2are independent. To investigate the advantage of this scheme, an efficient signaling method which works at a corner point of the achievable region for multiple-antenna scenarios is developed. In the proposed scheme, each base station only requires the state information of the channels between the other base station and each user. In this paper, the signaling scheme is elaborated for the case that each transmitter/receiver is equipped with three antennas. It is proven that in such a scenario, the multiplexing gain of four is achievable, which outperforms any other conventional schemes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".