Radiofrequency applications in congenital heart disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relatively recent application of radiofrequency technologies in the treatment of congenital heart defects has provided a safe and effective alternative to conventional therapies in establishing endovascular patency for a variety of lesions. Radiofrequency, with typically used frequencies of approximately 500 kHz, does not cause pain and is unlikely to induce atrial or ventricular fibrillation. It can be used either to ablate (higher power (35-50 W); longer duration of application (90-120 sec); lower voltage (30-50 V)) or to perforate (lower power (5-10 W) shorter duration of application (1-5 sec), higher voltage (150-280 V)). In the past, perforating radiofrequency has been applied to establish right ventricular outflow tract patency in pulmonary atresia with intact septum and with ventricular septal defect. More recently radiofrequency has been shown to be effective at recanalizing central and peripheral vasculature and has also been applied in establishing percutaneous left heart access. A new radiofrequency catheter, dedicated to transseptal left atrial cannulation, has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in an animal model and is now ready for clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".