Ventilatory constraints and dyspnea during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dyspnea (respiratory difficulty) and activity limitation are the primary symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and progress relentlessly as the disease advances, contributing to reduced quality of life. In COPD, the mechanisms of dyspnea are multifactorial, but abnormal dynamic ventilatory mechanics are believed to play a central role. In flow-limited patients with COPD, dynamic lung hyperinflation (DH) occurs during exercise and has serious sensory and mechanical consequences. In several studies, indices of DH strongly correlate with ratings of dyspnea intensity during exercise, and strategies that reduce resting hyperinflation (either pharmacological or surgical) consistently result in reduced exertional dyspnea. The mechanisms by which DH gives rise to exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance are complex, but recent mechanistic studies suggest that DH-induced inspiratory muscle loading, restriction of tidal volume expansion during exercise, and consequent neuromechanical uncoupling of the respiratory system are key components. This review examines the specific derangements of ventilatory mechanics that occur in COPD during exercise and attempts to provide a mechanistic rationale for the attendant respiratory discomfort and activity limitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".