MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153978133 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1349680

Integrated solutions for wireless MPLS and Mobile IP: current status and future directions

2004· article· en· W2153978133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiprotocol Label SwitchingRoamingComputer networkQuality of serviceComputer scienceMobile IPStandardizationMobile QoSMobility managementKey (lock)Mobile computingService providerService (business)Computer securityBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile IP (MIP) has been chosen as the core of the mobility management mechanism for wireless LANs, 3G cellular networks and, most recently, aeronautical networks. It is viewed as a key element in providing a universal roaming solution across different types of networks. However, MIP, in its basic form, inherits the IP incapability to provide quality of service (QoS) guarantees. This ramifies with MIP's lack of support for seamless intra-domain mobility. The paper surveys the current efforts to enhance the MIP QoS functionality via extensions for multiprotocol label switching (MPLS), both in the venues of research and standardization. It first gives a brief overview of MIP and MPLS, together with their combined shortcomings in maintaining QoS delivery to the mobile end user. From there it examines the different initiatives to extend MPLS for Mobile IP. Finally, an overview of issues that are yet to be addressed is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it