MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153979116 · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.5.474

Early-generated Preplate Neurons in the Developing Telencephalon: Inward Migration into the Developing Striatum

2001· article· en· W2153979116 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tadashi Hamasaki

Bibliographic record

VenueCerebral Cortex · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsRIKEN
KeywordsNeuroscienceStriatumBiologyGanglionic eminenceCerebral cortexCerebrumCortex (anatomy)Central nervous systemDopamine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Specialized subsets of early-generated neurons provide the cellular cues that are necessary for the establishment of characteristic cell and fiber interactions in each brain region. During the development of the mammalian cerebral cortex, the early-generated cells line up in the most superficial part of the telencephalic pallium forming the preplate. It has been generally thought that the preplate derivatives are exclusively located in the cortical region and govern the early histogenetic phase of cortical development. However, we here disclose an unexpected evidence that a subset of early-generated neurons of the piriform preplate migrate inward into and disperse within the subcortical structure striatum during the embryonic stage. Their migratory route is unique and its direction is opposite to the ordinary migration of neuronal precursors directed outward from the periventricular germinal zone. After immigrating into the developing striatum, these early-generated cells are closely associated with the intrastriatal fascicules of axons. The majority of these cells are eliminated by apoptotic cell death during the early postnatal stage. Based on these findings, we propose a new concept: the preplate neurons may not only direct cortical histogenesis but also change their location to play a role in the development of subcortical structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCerebral CortexSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207