MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metastatic Bone Marrow Tumors Manifested by Hematologic Disorders: Study of Thirty-Four Cases and Review of Literature

2014· article· en· W2153999667 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guan Min Lai, Jen‐Tsun Lin, Cheng‐Shyong Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematological disorders and diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMicroangiopathic hemolytic anemiaBone marrowPancytopeniaInternal medicineAnemiaCytopeniaBone marrow examinationMetastasisCancerGastroenterologyMalignancyOncologyThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Bone marrow metastasis of cancer is a sign of extensively hematogenous spreading of cancer and may be a terminal event of those patients. With the improvement of systemic chemotherapy for malignant disease, some patients may have longer survival. We plan to find out the clinical hematologic presentation and prognostic factors in cancer patients with bone marrow metastasis. Materials & Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the results of 162 bone marrow examination carried out in adult malignancy patients (colon, lung, gastric, breast and prostate cancers) between January 2002 and December 2012 in Changhua Christian Hospital. The indication for bone marrow study for those patients with hematologic disorders included: leukoerythroblastosis, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, unknown etiology of anemia, thrombocytopenia, bicytopenia and pancytopenia. Statistics analysis used SPSS 18.0 and overall survival was analyzed with the use of Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Results: Thirty-four patients (20.9%) had evidence of involvement of the bone marrow by a solid tumor, most common cancers were prostate and lung. At the time of diagnosis, the most common hematologic disorders were leukoerythroblastosis and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Median survival after the diagnosis of bone marrow metastasis with supportive care only compared with definite treatments was 0.3 months and 20.6 months (p<0.0001). Patients with visceral organ metastasis (0.4 months vs 6.4 months, respectively; p <0.002) and anemia (2.1 months vs 6.4 months, p=0.031) had inferior survival. Patents without any cytopenia had better survival (12.5 months vs 4.1 months, p=0.029). Initial level of thrombocyte and neutrophil, bone marrow infiltration type (focal or diffuse) and disease status were not significant prognostic factor. Conclusions: Visceral metastasis and anemia are most poor prognostic factors in solid cancers with bone marrow metastasis. Since the improvement of the diagnosis and treatment for cancers during the recent decades, a portion of patients can be had better disease control after definite treatment especially in breast and prostate cancers with bone marrow metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical OncologySame topicHematological disorders and diagnosticsFrench-language works237,207