MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154006376 · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871062

A new binary sequence family with low correlation and large size

2006· article· en· W2154006376 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsBinary numberInteger (computer science)PhysicsCorrelationSequence (biology)MathematicsArithmeticGeometryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For odd n=2l+1 and an integer /spl rho/ with 1/spl les//spl rho//spl les/l, a new family S/sub o/(/spl rho/) of binary sequences of period 2/sup n/-1 is constructed. For a given /spl rho/, S/sub o/(/spl rho/) has maximum correlation 1+2/sup n+2/spl rho/-1/2/, family size 2/sup n/spl rho//, and maximum linear span n(n+1)/2. Similarly, a new family of S/sub e/(/spl rho/) of binary sequences of period 2/sup n/-1 is also presented for even n=2l and an integer /spl rho/ with 1/spl les//spl rho/<l, where maximum correlation, family size, and maximum linear span are 1+2/sup n/2+/spl rho//,2/sup n/spl rho//, and n(n+1)/2, respectively. The new family S/sub o/(/spl rho/) (or S/sub e/(/spl rho/)) contains Boztas and Kumar's construction (or Udaya's) as a subset if m-sequences are excluded from both constructions. As a good candidate with low correlation and large family size, the family S/sub o/(2) is discussed in detail by analyzing its distribution of correlation values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it