MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154142544 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.113.110759

The Effects of Chemotherapy with Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cis-Platinum (BEP) on Rat Sperm Chromatin Remodeling, Fecundity and Testicular Gene Expression in the Progeny1

2013· article· en· W2154142544 on OpenAlexafffund
Jennifer Maselli, Barbara F. Hales, Bernard Robaire

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyProtamineSpermHistoneChromatinSpermiogenesisAndrologyHistone H4EndocrinologyCell biologyInternal medicineGeneticsGeneBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During spermiogenesis, histones are replaced first by transition proteins and then by protamines, resulting in a very condensed sperm DNA structure that is absolutely critical for normal sperm function. We have demonstrated previously that, despite a 9-wk recovery period, mature sperm from rats treated for 9 wk with bleomycin, etoposide, and cis-platinum (BEP), the drugs used to treat testicular cancer, have reduced levels of protamine 1 and a concomitant upregulation of specific histones, highlighting a problem in histone eviction. Here, we demonstrate that regulators of histone removal are increased in elongating spermatids following recovery; however, Ac-H4 and gamma H2AX histones remain elevated in elongating spermatids or caudal epididymal spermatozoa 9 wk post-BEP treatment. This indicates that chromatin remodelers and effector proteins that respond to histone removal cues may be a target of BEP treatment. A decrease in the expression of SMARCE1 in elongating spermatids may explain the persistent retention of histones in cauda epididymal sperm 9 wk after the cessation of BEP treatment. Remarkably, proteins implicated in the translational control and posttranslational processing of protamine 1 are also significantly elevated 9 wk post-BEP treatment, suggesting that histone eviction may dictate the DNA availability for protamine binding. Males mated to control females 9 wk after BEP treatment have reduced litter sizes; moreover, the profile of gene expression in the developing testes of their pups is altered. Altering the proportion of histones to protamine in mature spermatozoa has an adverse impact on male fecundity, with modifications to epigenetic marks potentially threatening normal progeny development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207