MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154153008 · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7827

The prevention and management of rabies

2015· review· en· W2154153008 on OpenAlexaff
Natasha S. Crowcroft, Nisha Thampi

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioPublic Health Ontario
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsRabiesLyssavirusRabies virusMedicineDiseasePublic healthTropical diseasePost-exposure prophylaxisEnvironmental healthVirologyRhabdoviridaePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Box 2 Schedule for pre-exposure vaccination (day 0 is date of first dose) Intramuscular-one dose on each of days 0, 7, and 21 or 28* Intradermal-one injection on each of days 0, 7, and 21 or 28 *WHO recommends following the schedule as closely as possible. The series need not be restarted if doses are not given exactly to schedule Vials should be used within six hours of opening. To maximize cost savings, sessions should involve enough people to avoid vaccine wastage Box 3 Examples of national sources of advice on rabies diagnosis, prevention, and post-exposure prophylaxis Australia-Australian immunization handbook www.health.gov.au/internet/immunise/publishing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207