MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2154156842 · doi:10.4141/cjas2012-053

Blindness in Smoky Joe roosters results in advanced sexual maturation

2012· article· en· W2154156842 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jennifer Perttula, Grégoy Y. Bédécarrats

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotostimulationRoosterBlindnessTestosterone (patch)Partially sightedBiologyEndocrinologyReproductionInternal medicineMedicineVisually impairedNeuroscienceOptometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perttula, J. and Bédécarrats, G. Y. 2012. Blindness in Smoky Joe roosters results in advanced sexual maturation. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 92: 483–491. In chickens, an increase in photoperiod activates the hypothalamo-pituitary gonadal axis resulting in sexual maturation. Although it is well established that light can directly stimulate the hypothalamus, the relative contribution of the eye in the control of reproduction is still controversial. Using a genetically blind line of chickens (Smoky Joe), we investigated the relative importance of the retina of the eye in sexual maturation in roosters. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of photostimulation, three generations of blind and sighted Smoky Joe roosters were utilize. Generation 1 (G1) was photostimulated at 17 wk of age, while generation 2 (G2) was left un-photostimulated and generation 3 (G3) was photostimulated at 12 wk of age. Blind roosters in G1 and G2 matured between 17 and 19 wk of age (testicular weight, comb length) independently of photostimulation whereas maturation of sighted animals was significantly delayed in G2. However, this advanced sexual maturation was no longer evident when birds were stimulated at 12 wk of age. Blind roosters in G2 showed advanced spermatogenesis when compared with sighted animals. No significant difference in plasma testosterone levels was observed for any of the three generations. In conclusion, although still photosensitive, blind rooster sexually matured spontaneously earlier than their sighted counterpart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→