MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154176717 · doi:10.1145/1874551.1874552

Hypertext 2010 conference review

2010· article· en· W2154176717 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alvin Chin

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGWEB Newsletter · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUsability and User Interface Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypertextHypermediaNova scotiaWorld Wide WebLibrary scienceHyperCardComputer scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hypertext conference is SIGWEB's flagship conference every year on hypertext and hypermedia. This year's Hypertext 2010 was the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia and was held at the University of Toronto campus in Toronto, Canada from June 13--16, 2010. Everyone enjoyed the hospitality of the local conference committee and student volunteers, which made the conference run smoothly and efficiently. The General Chair for Hypertext 2010 was Mark Chignell from the University of Toronto, and the Program Chair was Elaine Toms from Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.080

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGWEB NewsletterSame topicUsability and User Interface DesignFrench-language works237,207