Filtration rates of the non-native Chinese mystery snail (Bellamya chinensis) and potential impacts on microbial communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Invasive species in the phylum Mollusca, including gastropods and bivalves, have caused substantial impacts in freshwater ecosystems. The Chinese mystery snail, Bellamya chinensis, is a large viviparid snail native to Southeastern Asia and widely introduced throughout United States and parts of Canada and Europe. B. chinensis is a facultative filter-feeding detritivore that can both graze epiphytic diatoms using its radula and filter-feed its breathing water. Despite mounting concern associated with the expanding range and increasing abundance of B. chinensis in many parts of its invaded range, the potential ecological impacts of this non-native species remain largely unknown. Here, we used a series of laboratory experiments to assess filtration rates of B. chinensis and quantify its effects on microbial communities. According to both microcosm (24-hour, 4-L suspension) and mesocosm (5-day, 90-L suspension) experimental trials, B. chinensis exhibited an average filtration rate of 106-113 mL snail-1h-1(1.45 mL mg DW-1h-1) and an individual maximum of 471 mL snail-1h-1(6.15 mL mg DW-1h-1). These values are comparable to reported filtration rates for high-profile invasive, freshwater bivalves. Relationships between snail size and filtration rate relationship suggests that B. chinensis display an ontogenetic shift in feeding behavior from primarily radular grazing to increased filter-feeding at threshold size of approximately 44 mm shell height. Our experiments also revealed that high snail densities can result in small, significant shifts in bacterial community composition. These results suggest that B. chinensis may influence microbial communities either directly by using bacteria as a food source or indirectly by producing sufficiently large quantities of fecal and pseudo-fecal material to affect bacterial activity and growth. The overall ecological effects and importance of B. chinensis filtration behavior remain unclear, but our experimental results suggest that these impacts may be large and should be further investigated to better understand its potential role in coupling benthic and pelagic food webs in lake ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".