Acute Liver Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase I Overexpression Recapitulates Reduced Palmitate Oxidation of Cardiac Hypertrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Muscle carnitine palmitoyltransferase I is predominant in the heart, but the liver isoform (liver carnitine palmitoyltransferase I [L-CPT1]) is elevated in hearts with low long chain fatty acid oxidation, such as fetal and hypertrophied hearts. OBJECTIVE: This work examined the effect of acute L-CPT1 expression on the regulation of palmitate oxidation and energy metabolism in intact functioning rat hearts for comparison with findings in hypertrophied hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: L-CPT1 was expressed in vivo in rat hearts by coronary perfusion of Adv.cmv.L-CPT1 (L-CPT1, n=15) vs. phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) infusion (PBS, n=7) or empty virus (empty, n=5). L-CPT1 was elevated 5-fold at 72 hours after Adv.cmv.L-CPT1 infusion (P<0.05), but muscle carnitine palmitoyltransferase I was unaffected. Despite similar tricarboxylic acid cycle rates, palmitate oxidation rates were reduced with L-CPT1 (1.12 ± 0.29 μmol/min per gram of dry weight, mean±SE) vs. PBS (1.6 ± 0.34). Acetyl CoA production from palmitate was reduced with L-CPT1 (69 ± 0.02%; P<0.05; PBS=79 ± 0.01%; empty=81 ± 0.02%), similar to what occurs in hypertrophied hearts, and with no difference in malonyl CoA content. Glucose oxidation was elevated with L-CPT1 (by 60%). Surprisingly, L-CPT1 hearts contained elevated atrial natriuretic peptide, indicating induction of hypertrophic signaling. CONCLUSIONS: The results link L-CPT1 expression to reduced palmitate oxidation in a nondiseased adult heart, recapitulating the phenotype of reduced long chain fatty acid oxidation in cardiac hypertrophy. The implications are that L-CPT1 expression induces metabolic remodeling hypertrophic signaling and that regulatory factors beyond malonyl CoA in the heart regulate long chain fatty acid oxidation via L-CPT1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".