MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2154295992 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1650

Structure and dynamics of the supercluster of galaxies SC0028-0005

2015· article· en· W2154295992 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Ana Laura O’Mill, Dominique Proust, H. V. Capelato, M Castejon, E. S. Cypriano, G. B. Lima Neto, L. Sodré

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasYork UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityOffice of ScienceJohns Hopkins UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloHarvard UniversityOhio State UniversityNational Science FoundationUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale UniversityUniversity of ArizonaPrinceton UniversityBrookhaven National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsSupercluster (genetic)PhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyRedshiftAstronomySkyMass distributionLine-of-sight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the standard cosmological scenario, superclusters are objects that have just passed the turn-around point and are collapsing.The dynamics of very few superclusters have been analysed up to now.In this paper, we study the supercluster SC0028-0005, at redshift 0.22, identify the most prominent groups and/or clusters that make up the supercluster, and investigate the dynamic state of this structure.For the membership identification, we have used photometric and spectroscopic data from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 10, finding six main structures in a flat spatial distribution.We have also used a deep multiband observation with MegaCam/Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope to estimate de mass distribution through the weak-lensing effect.For the dynamical analysis, we have determined the relative distances along the line of sight within the supercluster using the Fundamental Plane of early-type galaxies.Finally, we have computed the peculiar velocities of each of the main structures.The 3D distribution suggests that SC0028-005 is indeed a collapsing supercluster, supporting the formation scenario of these structures.Using the spherical collapse model, we estimate that the mass within r = 10 Mpc should lie between 4 and 16 × 10 15 M .The farthest detected members of the supercluster suggest that within ∼60 Mpc the density contrast is δ ∼ 3 with respect to the critical density at z = 0.22, implying a total mass of ∼4.6-16 × 10 17 M , most of which in the form of low-mass galaxy groups or smaller substructures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→