MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154325287 · doi:10.2337/diabetes.53.3.513

Transcriptional Control of Apolipoprotein A-I Gene Expression in Diabetes

2004· review· en· W2154325287 on OpenAlexaff
Arshag D. Mooradian, Michael J. Haas, Norman C.W. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineApolipoprotein BDiabetes mellitusInsulinInsulin resistanceGene expressionHormoneDiabetic ketoacidosisKetoacidosisCholesterolMedicineBiologyGeneType 1 diabetesBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular disease continues to be the leading cause of mortality in diabetes. One of the factors contributing to the increased risk is the high prevalence rate of low plasma concentrations of HDL cholesterol. Multiple potential mechanisms account for the cardioprotective effects of HDL and its main protein apolipoprotein (apo) A-I. The reduced plasma concentrations of HDL could be the result of increased fractional clearance of HDL and reduced expression of apo A-I. In animal models of diabetes and in cell cultures treated with high concentrations of glucose, apo A-I expression is reduced. In this review we will discuss the alterations in transcriptional control of apo A-I in diabetes. The role of select nutritional and hormonal alterations commonly found in diabetes will be reviewed. Specifically, we will review the literature on the effect of hyperglycemia, hypoinsulinemia, and ketoacidosis, as well as the role of various mediators of insulin resistance, such as fatty acids, cytokines, and prostanoids, on apo A-I promoter activity. Identifying the mechanisms that modulate apo A-I gene expression will aid in the new development of therapeutic agents that increase plasma apo A-I and HDL concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207