MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154326504 · doi:10.1287/opre.1120.1041

Fixed-Charge Transportation Problem: Facets of the Projection Polyhedron

2012· article· en· W2154326504 on OpenAlexaff
Yogesh K. Agarwal, Y.P. Aneja

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Mathematical Programming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyhedronHeuristicsFixed chargeProjection (relational algebra)Facet (psychology)Variable (mathematics)Mathematical optimizationFixed costComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)Transportation theoryFacility location problemCharge (physics)Unit (ring theory)Fixed pointMathematicsCombinatoricsAlgorithmPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider the well-known fixed-charge transportation problem. To send any flow from source si to destination tj, we incur a unit variable shipping cost of cij and a fixed cost fij. Here we study the structure of the projection polyhedron of this problem, in the space of 0-1 variables associated with fixed charges, and we develop several classes of valid inequalities and derive conditions under which they are facet defining. In some cases, if the conditions are not satisfied, we show how they can be lifted to define facets. Several heuristics for generating and adding these facets are presented. Using these results, we develop a computationally effective algorithm for solving the problem. The computational results clearly indicate the usefulness of this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOperations ResearchSame topicOptimization and Mathematical ProgrammingFrench-language works237,207